Featured · Research·
The State of AI QA in Mid-Market SaaS 2026
n=41 calls, 9,103 test steps, 230k Playwright MCP downloads. The 2026 benchmark on QA team size, the locator tax, and the agentic testing layer.
Read the reportBlog
Research, frameworks, and comparisons from the QAby.AI team.
Browse by topic
All posts →Latest
View all →
Comparisons·
Playwright Pricing: Free Tool, Six-Figure Hidden Cost
Playwright is free to download. But maintaining it at a 50–200 engineer team costs an SDET hire ($160K+/yr). The honest math on creation, flake, and CI.
Comparisons·
Playwright vs QAby.AI: When Code Tests Stop Scaling
Playwright won the framework war. AI agents won the maintenance war. Why mid-market SaaS teams move from Playwright code to AI-led regression.
Research·
AI QA Testing: What Changes for QA Leads in 2026
Five things change in a QA Lead job when AI QA testing arrives, and three things do not. A POV pillar grounded in 41 interviews with mid-market SaaS QA leaders.
Comparisons·
The AI Test Automation Tools Handbook for Mid-Market SaaS (2026)
A buyer-side handbook to AI test automation tools in 2026. Four tool buckets, 10 platforms mid-market teams evaluated this year, a 9-criterion scorecard, TCO math, and a 30-day evaluation playbook.
Engineering·
AI Testing: The Definitive Guide for Engineering Teams in 2026
A 4,500-word pillar guide to AI testing for engineering teams. What it is, what it solves, what it doesn’t, the 8-feature buyer checklist, cost framing, and a 30-day rollout plan.
Comparisons·
The AI Testing Tool Buyer Guide: 8 Features That Actually Matter
The 8-feature scorecard for buying an AI testing tool in 2026: discovery, authoring, healing, CI/CD, telemetry, cost, ownership, and exit. With red flags, the 30-day POC playbook, and the green-pipeline test.